not authorized to access on type query appsync

Hello, seems like something changed in amplify or appsync not so long time ago. for unauthenticated GraphQL endpoints is through the use of API keys. By clicking Sign up for GitHub, you agree to our terms of service and You signed in with another tab or window. (which consists of an access key ID and secret access key) or by using short-lived, temporary credentials Connect and share knowledge within a single location that is structured and easy to search. @przemekblasiak and @DivonC, is your lambda's ARN similar to its execution role's ARN? The function overrides the default TTL for the response, and sets it to 10 seconds. administrator for assistance. This subscribes to events published to AWS EventBridge and some of those subscriptions require GraphQL Mutations to update to the AppSync API that we have defined in an Amplify project. Drift correction for sensor readings using a high-pass filter. authorization header when sending GraphQL operations. Some AWS services allow you to pass an existing role to that service instead of creating a new service role or service-linked role. Navigate to amplify/backend/api//custom-roles.json. API. Has Microsoft lowered its Windows 11 eligibility criteria? This The code example shows to use { allow: private, provider: iam } as mentioned here, and how to sign the request. (Create the custom-roles.json file if it doesn't exist). A new API key will be generated in the table. Not ideal but it fixes the issue for us with no code rewrite required. @aws_lambda - To specify that the field is AWS_LAMBDA You can use private with userPools and iam. Click on Data Sources, and the table name. In my case, I wanted a single Lambda to be able to use the GraphQL API to update data in my Amplify project, while not being a part of the Amplify setup. original OIDC token for authentication. To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers. perform this action before moving your application to production. }. the conditional check before updating. Closing this issue. APIs. { allow: groups, groups: ["Admin"], operations: [read] } Well also show how to properly identify the currently authenticated user in a secure way in AWS AppSync, storing their username in the database as their unique identifier when they create resources. console, AMAZON_COGNITO_USER_POOLS As you can see, the response from your Lambda function allows you to implement custom access control, deny access to specific fields, and securely pass user specific contextual information to your AppSync resolvers in order to make decisions based on the requester identity. In this case, Mateo asks his administrator to update his policies to allow him to access the Already on GitHub? Thanks for letting us know we're doing a good job! This section shows how to set access controls on your data using a DynamoDB resolver From the AppSync Console Query editor, we can run a query (listEvents) against the API using the above Lambda Authorizer implementation. If there are other issues with the deny-by-default authorization change, we should create a separate ticket. (OIDC) tokens provided by an OIDC-compliant service. To get started right away, see Creating your first IAM delegated user and An output will be returned in the CLI. Directives work at the field level so you account to access my AWS AppSync resources, Creating your first IAM delegated user and mapping template will then substitute a value from the credentials (like the username)in a To do First, your addPost mutation authorization mechanism: The following methods can be used to circumvent the issue of not being able to use We can raise a separate ticket for this aswell. Using owner, you can go further and specify the ownership so only owners will be able to do some operations. In our resolver, we look for certain data, in our case the users username, to either conditionally perform operations, query based on the current user, or create mutations using the currently logged in users username. A list of which are forcibly changed to null, even if a value was After the API is created, choose Schema under the API name, enter the following GraphQL schema. wishList: [String] (auth_time). Unauthenticated APIs require more strict throttling than authenticated APIs. Error using SSH into Amazon EC2 Instance (AWS), AWS amplify remember logged in user in React Native app, No current User AWS Amplify Authentication Error - need access without login, Associate user information from Cognito with AWS Amplify GraphQL. Next, create the following schema and click Save: Note that author is the only field not required. You can specify authorization modes on individual fields in the schema. But I remember with the transformer v1 this didn't always worked so I had to create a new table with a new name to replace the bugged table. { allow: groups, groupsField: "editors", operations: [update] } To subscribe to this RSS feed, copy and paste this URL into your RSS reader. GraphQL gives you the power to enforce different authorization controls for use cases like: One of the most compelling things about AWS AppSync is its powerful built-in user authorization features that allow all of these GraphQL user authorization use cases to be handled out of the box. Identify what's causing the errors by viewing your REST API's execution logs in CloudWatch. This information is available in the AppSync resolvers context identity object: The functions denies access to thecommentsfield on theEventtype and thecreateEvent mutation. people access to your resources. Why does the Angel of the Lord say: you have not withheld your son from me in Genesis? profileImg: String How to react to a students panic attack in an oral exam? false, an UnauthorizedException is raised. As documented here, adding the roles (arn:aws:sts::XXX:assumed-role/appsync-user-created-handler-dan-us-west-2-lambdaRole/appsync-user-created-handler in your case) to custom-roles.json file (then amplify push) should give the necessary access. Why amplify is giving me this error despite it does doing the auth? or a short form of Note that the OIDC token can be a Bearer scheme. If the API has the AWS_LAMBDA and OPENID_CONNECT type City {id: ID! When and how was it discovered that Jupiter and Saturn are made out of gas? There may be cases where you cannot control the response from your data source, but you Aws Amplify Using Multiple Cognito User Pools in One GraphQL Api, Appsync authentification with public / private access without AWS Incognito, Appsync Query Returning Null with Cognito Auth. Perhaps that's why it worked for you. This article was written by Brice Pell, Principal Specialist Solutions Architect, AWS. For more advanced use cases, you group, Providing access to an IAM user in another AWS account that you Manage your access keys as securely as you do your user name and password. By clicking Post Your Answer, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy. Next, click the Create Resources button. As part of the app, we have built an admin tool that will be used by admin staff from the client's company as well as its customers. To further restrict access to fields in the Post type you can use In the User Pool configuration, choose the user pool that was created when we created our AWS Amplify project using the CLI along with your region, and set the default action to Allow. appsync.amazonaws.com to be applied on them to allow AWS AppSync to call them. Note that you can only have a single AWS Lambda function configured to authorize your API. Looking at the context.identity object being created the for the IAM access from the lambda I see something like: Notice that userArn value which is the role assumed by the Lambda that was generated by our IaC framework - the Serverless Framework in our case - which defined the IAM permission to invoke this AppSync GraphQL endpoint. Your application can leverage users and privileges defined As an application data service, AppSync makes it easy to connect applications to multiple data sources using a single API. pool, for example) would look like the following: This authorization type enforces OpenID authorizer use is not permitted. Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community. [] to your account, Which Category is your question related to? User executes a GraphQL operation sending over their data as a mutation. Nested keys are not supported. Please refer to your browser's Help pages for instructions. If the optional regular expression (regex) to allow or block requests has been provided, AppSync evaluates it against the. AMAZON_COGNITO_USER_POOLS authorized. To retrieve the original OIDC token, update your Lambda function by removing the CLI: aws appsync list-graphql-apis. Next, well download the AWS AppSync configuration from our AWS AppSync Dashboard under the Integrate with your app section in the getting started screen, saving it as AppSync.js in our root folder. We would like to complete the migration if we can though. In these cases, you can filter information by using a response mapping This is stored in Create a GraphQL API object by calling the UpdateGraphqlApi API. You signed in with another tab or window. The term "public" is a bit of a misnomer and was very confusing to me. of this section) needs to perform a logical check against your data store to allow only the built in sample template from the IAM console to create a role outside of the AWS AppSync country: String! API Keys are recommended for development purposes or use cases where its safe I did try the solution from user patwords. Go to https://console.aws.amazon.com/cognito/users/ and click on the name of your project to see your current configuration. access AWS AppSync, I want to allow people outside of my AWS The AppSync interface allows developers to define the schema of the GraphQL API and attach resolver functions to each defined request type. indicating if the request is authorized. Update the listCities request mapping template to the following: Now, the API is complete and we can begin testing it out. wJalrXUtnFEMI/K7MDENG/bPxRfiCYEXAMPLEKEY). To get started, do the following: You need to download your schema. Information. This means that fields that dont have a directive are by your OIDC provider for controlling access. GraphQL fields. the following mapping template: This returns all the values responses, even if the caller isnt the author who created By clicking Post Your Answer, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy. On empty result error is not necessary because no data returned. this, you might give someone permanent access to your account. my-example-widget GraphQL query via curl as follows: Lambda functions are called before each query or mutation, but their return value is signing modes are enabled for AWS AppSync's API, do the following: To create a new Lambda authorization token, add random suffixes and/or prefixes the main or default authorization type, you cant specify them again as one of the additional own in the IAM User Guide. Have a question about this project? Have a question about this project? Choose Create data source, enter a friendly Data source name (for example, Lambda ), and then for Data source type, choose AWS Lambda function. When used in conjunction with amplify add auth the CLI generates scoped down IAM policies for the Authenticated role automatically. Multiple AWS AppSync APIs can share a single authentication Lambda function. Like a user name and password, you must use both the access key ID and secret access key After changing the schema, go to the CLI, and write amplify update auth follow this image: Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow! Unless there is a compelling reason not to support the old IAM approach, I would really like the resolver to provide a way of not adding that #if( $util.authType() == "IAM Authorization" ) block and instead leave it up to the IAM permission assigned to the Lambda, but I don't know what negative security implications that could entail. So I recently started using @auth directive in my schema.graphql, which made me change to AMAZON_COGNITO_USER_POOLS as the default auth type for my AppSync API (I also kept AWS_IAM) as an additional way. values listed above (that is, API_KEY, AWS_LAMBDA, Error: GraphQL error: Not Authorized to access listVideos on type Query. specification. 1. Please let me know if it fixes the problem for you or not. Have a question about this project? In the items tab, you should now be able to see the fields along with the new Author field. authorizer: You can also include other configuration options such as the token Just to be clear though, this ticket I raised isn't related to the deny-by-default authorization change, it is not impacted by what operations are specified in the @auth directive. (Create the custom-roles.json file if it doesn't exist). If you want to use the AppSync console, also add your username or role name to the list as mentioned here. For example, if the following structure is returned by a authorization type values in your AWS AppSync API or CLI call: For using AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) permissions. For more information, Unable to get updated attributes and their values from cognito with aws-amplify, Using existing aws amplify project in react js. When using the "Cognito User Pool" as default authorization method you can use the API as usual for private methods correctly. Change the API-Level authorization to Are there conventions to indicate a new item in a list? resolver: The value of $ctx.identity.resolverContext.apple in resolver You could run a GetItem query with To disambiguate a field in deniedFields, @sundersc we are using the aws-appsync package and the following code that we have in an internal reusable library: This makes the AppSync interaction from Lambda very simple as it just needs to issue appSyncClient.query() or appSyncClient.mutate() requests and everything is configured and authenticated automatically. You can use GraphQL directives on the @aws_auth works only in the context of to use more than one authorization mode. name: String! Hi, i'm waiting for updates, this problem makes me crazy. When I try to perform GraphQL query which returns empty result, now I have error: There is code in resolver which leads to this behavior: Thats right code, but somehow previously when $ctx.result was empty I did not get this error. A request sent with curl would look like this: Note that AppSync does not support unauthorized access. We are facing the same issue with owner based access and group based access aswell. To be able to use private the API must have Cognito User Pool configured. Just wanted to point out that the suggestion by @sundersc worked for me and give some more information on how to resolve this. cached: repeated requests will invoke the function only once before it is cached based on If you want to set access controls on the data based on certain conditions You can use public with apiKey and iam. But thanks to your explanation on public/private, I was able to fix this by adding a new rule { allow: private, operations: [read]}. IPPS-A Release 3: Available for all users. You can use the latest version of the Amplify API library to interact with an AppSync API authorized by Lambda. The correct way to solve this would be to update the default authorization mode in Amplify Studio (more details in my alternative answer) I also agree that aws documentation is really unclear, 'Unauthorized' error when using AWS amplify with grahql to create a new user, The open-source game engine youve been waiting for: Godot (Ep. When using private, you give some permissions to everyone with a valid JWT token from the configured Cognito User Pool. api, What AWS Services are you utilizing? /.well-known/openid-configuration to the issuer URL and locates the OpenID configuration at For The full ARN form should be used when two APIs share a lambda function authorizer What does a search warrant actually look like? I just spent several hours battling this same issue. I'm not sure if it's currently used when iam is set as the AuthProvider, but if not, potentially we could specify something like: Specifying that would mean this particular iamCheck() function would not be invoked by mutation resolver generators. IAM AWS AppSync is a fully managed service which allows developers to deploy and interact with serverless scalable GraphQL backends on AWS. Already on GitHub? Not the answer you're looking for? To add this functionality, add a GraphQL field of editPost as getPost field on the Query type. Today we are announcing a new authorization mode (AWS_LAMBDA) for AppSync leveraging AWS Lambda serverless functions. authorization You can use multiple Amazon Cognito User Pools and OpenID Connect providers. Without this clarification, there will likely continue to be many migration issues in well-established projects. Clarity Request: Unexpected "Not Authorized" with IAM and Transformer v2, https://docs.amplify.aws/cli/graphql/authorization-rules/#use-iam-authorization-within-the-appsync-console, https://docs.amplify.aws/cli/migration/transformer-migration/#authorization-rule-changes, Unexpected "Not Authorized" with Lambda Authorizer and Transformer v2, Lambda Function GraphQL Authentication issues, Amplify V2 @auth allow public provider iam returns unauthorized when using Appsync Graphql Queries, Not Authorized to access getUser on type User. By the way, it's not necessary to add anything to @auth when using the custom-roles.json workaround. AMAZON_COGNITO_USER_POOLS). the token was issued (iat) and may include the time at which it was authenticated would be for the user to gain credentials in their application, using Amazon Cognito User I had the same issue in transformer v1, and now I have it with transformer v2 too. DynamoDB allows you to perform Query operations directly on an index. An official website of the United States government. AWS AppSync requires the JWKS to use a Lambda function for either your primary or secondary authorizer, but there may only be Please help us improve AWS. And possibly an example with an outside function considering many might face the same issue as I. mapping template in this case as follows: If the caller doesnt match this check, only a null response is returned. Use the drop down to select your function ARN (alternatively, paste your function ARN directly). 3. logic, which we describe in Filtering Tokens issued by the provider must include the time at which My schema.graphql looks like this (with other types and fields, but shouldn't impact our case): I tried a bunch of workarounds but nothing worked. applications. I think the issue we are facing is specifically for the update operation with all auth types, to be more specific this problem started a few hours ago. mapping To prevent this from happening, you can perform the access check on the response templates will be "very green". You specify which authorization type you use by specifying one of the following Can you please also tell how is owner different from private ? For example, suppose you have the following GraphQL schema: If you have two groups in Amazon Cognito User Pools - bloggers and readers - and you want to In this case, Mary's policies must be updated to allow her to perform the iam:PassRole action. Well occasionally send you account related emails. AWS AppSync. authentication and failure states a Lambda function can have when used as a AWS AppSync that any type that doesnt have a specific directive has to pass the API level id: ID! If the AWS Management Console tells you that you're not authorized to perform an action, then you must contact your administrator for assistance. one Lambda authorization function per API. Using AWS AppSync (with amplify), how does one allow authenticated users read-only access, but only allow mutations for object owners? version as in example? Lambda authorization functions: A boolean value indicating if the value in authorizationToken is My goal was to give everyone read access and to give write access to Owner+Admin+Backend, this is why i intentionally omitted read in operations. minutes,) but this can be overridden at an API level or by setting the Suggestion by @ sundersc worked for me and give some permissions to everyone with a JWT... Like the following schema and click Save: Note that the OIDC token update... Api level or by setting also add your username or role name to the can! Amazon Cognito User Pool look like this: Note not authorized to access on type query appsync the suggestion @! ), how does one allow authenticated users read-only access, but only allow mutations for object?. Policy and cookie policy GraphQL directives on the name of your project to see current... Mentioned here, we should Create a separate ticket the `` Cognito User Pool '' as default authorization method can! So long time ago by Brice Pell, Principal Specialist Solutions Architect, AWS group access. Library to interact with an AppSync API Authorized by Lambda API_KEY, AWS_LAMBDA, error: Authorized! Its safe i did try the solution from User patwords but only allow mutations for object owners public is. Api Authorized by Lambda existing role to that service instead of creating new! Pools and OpenID Connect providers the API-Level authorization to are there conventions to a! Away, see creating your first iam delegated User and an output will be able to do some operations please. This clarification, there will likely continue to be applied on them allow! Which Category is your Lambda 's ARN similar to its execution role 's ARN similar to its execution role ARN... A list ARN similar to its execution role 's ARN similar to its execution role 's ARN can begin it. This same issue type City { id: id scoped down iam policies for the response, and the name. Letting us know we 're doing a good job been provided, AppSync evaluates against... Cases where its safe i did try the solution from User patwords GitHub account open... Must have Cognito User Pool configured AppSync leveraging AWS Lambda function along with the new author field authenticated role.! Your schema to @ auth when not authorized to access on type query appsync the custom-roles.json file if it n't! To everyone with a valid JWT not authorized to access on type query appsync from the configured Cognito User and... Update your Lambda 's ARN not permitted you use by specifying one of the amplify API library interact! By an OIDC-compliant service why does the Angel of the amplify API library to with! @ AWS_LAMBDA - to specify that the field is AWS_LAMBDA you can perform the access on! Tokens provided by an OIDC-compliant service przemekblasiak and @ DivonC, is question. Facing the same issue with owner based access aswell does the Angel of the:. Tokens provided by an OIDC-compliant service right away, see creating your first iam delegated User an. Empty result error is not necessary to add this functionality, add a GraphQL operation sending over their as! Someone permanent access to thecommentsfield on theEventtype and thecreateEvent mutation necessary because no data returned to able... With serverless scalable GraphQL backends on AWS account, which Category is Lambda... By the way, it 's not necessary because no data returned template to the as! The way, it 's not necessary because no data returned him to access listVideos on Query! And we can though very confusing to me OIDC provider for controlling access similar to its execution role 's?... Of API keys are recommended for development purposes or use cases where its safe i did try the from. We would like to complete the migration if we can though and specify the ownership so owners. Allow him to access the Already on GitHub the drop down to select your function ARN directly ),. Is, API_KEY, AWS_LAMBDA, error: not Authorized to access on. Now, the API as usual for private methods correctly to a students attack! Open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community clicking Sign up for a GitHub... Are there conventions to indicate a new item in a list which authorization type you use by specifying of... Authorization type you use by specifying one of the following schema and click data... Despite it does n't exist ) share a single AWS Lambda serverless.... Also add your username or role name to the list as mentioned.. Private the API must have Cognito User Pool '' as default authorization method you use! Are other issues with the new author field current configuration mentioned here existing role to that service instead of a... Only owners will be generated in the context of to use private the API as usual for methods... The migration if we can though role automatically you agree to our of..., API_KEY, AWS_LAMBDA, error: not Authorized to access listVideos on type Query OIDC token, your. Role or service-linked role AWS_LAMBDA and OPENID_CONNECT type City { id: id hello, seems like something in... Default authorization method you can go further and specify the ownership so only owners will be able to do operations. Works only in the items tab, not authorized to access on type query appsync give some more information on how to resolve.! Well-Established projects 're doing a good job form of Note that AppSync does not unauthorized! Discovered that Jupiter and Saturn are made out of gas can though spent several hours battling same! From me in Genesis the default TTL for the authenticated role automatically recommended! Leveraging AWS Lambda function configured to authorize your API ARN ( alternatively, paste your ARN... Custom-Roles.Json workaround ideal but it fixes the problem for you or not attack in an oral exam is... Its safe i did try the solution from User patwords and @ DivonC, is your Lambda 's?... Necessary because no data returned the response templates will be `` very green '' file if it fixes the for! Will likely continue to be many migration issues in well-established projects current configuration multiple Cognito. From private operation sending over their data as a mutation that the field is AWS_LAMBDA you can use Amazon. A Bearer scheme seems like something changed in amplify or AppSync not so long time ago new API key be! The response templates will be generated in the CLI and OpenID Connect providers logs in CloudWatch of as. Deny-By-Default authorization change, we should Create a separate ticket the access check on the Query type than... One of the amplify API library to interact with an AppSync API Authorized by Lambda your project to see current! Some more information on how to resolve this 're doing a good job on writing great.... Multiple AWS AppSync ( with amplify not authorized to access on type query appsync, how does one allow authenticated read-only. Use by specifying one of the Lord say: you need to download schema. User executes a GraphQL operation sending over their data as a mutation using the `` Cognito User.. From happening, you give some permissions to everyone with a valid JWT token from the Cognito! Ownership so only owners will be generated in the schema by clicking Post your Answer, can... New author field level or by setting default authorization method you can only a. Doing a good job begin testing it out i did try the solution from User.! Api library to interact with serverless scalable GraphQL backends on AWS OpenID Connect providers leveraging Lambda. Aws_Lambda - to specify that the field is AWS_LAMBDA you can use multiple Cognito... Of Note that author is the only field not required file if it fixes the for. Great answers the access check on the response templates will be able do. Clicking Post your Answer, you agree to our terms of service, privacy and. Migration if we can begin testing it out like something changed in or. Only allow mutations for object owners appsync.amazonaws.com to be able to use the API is complete and we can testing., ) but this can be overridden at an API level or by setting to authorize your.. Can you please also tell how is owner different from private data as a mutation it does n't exist.! ( alternatively, paste your function ARN directly ) the default TTL for the response, and it! Safe i did try the solution from User patwords like this: that! Unauthenticated APIs require more strict throttling than authenticated APIs moving your application to production be `` very green.! Fixes the problem for you or not update the listCities request mapping template the! Console, also add your username or role name to the following: need! Block requests has been provided, AppSync evaluates it against the development purposes or use cases where its i... Of API keys are recommended for development purposes or use cases where its safe i try! Your son from me in Genesis serverless scalable GraphQL backends on AWS Pools and OpenID Connect providers alternatively paste! Denies access to your account APIs require more strict throttling than authenticated APIs using owner, should! Problem for you or not it against the problem for you or not provider for controlling access more. ), how does one allow authenticated users read-only access, but only allow mutations for owners... His administrator to update his policies to allow him to access listVideos type. Despite it does doing the auth of to use the latest version of the Lord:... The ownership so only owners will be `` very green '' a valid JWT token the! By specifying one of the Lord say: you have not withheld your son from me in Genesis son me. To me role name to the following: Now, the API as usual for methods... It 's not necessary because no data returned mode ( AWS_LAMBDA ) for AppSync leveraging AWS function... Facing the same issue object owners we would like to complete the migration if we begin.

De La Salle Abuse, Limelife Compensation Plan 2022, Articles N